RDP 2035

PRD-2035-presentation

RDP-2035 Presentation

A workshop under the Chairmanship of Shri G. R. Aloria, IAS, Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Urban Housing Department on “Initiating Preparation of Revised Development Plan of Surat -2035” was organized by SUDA on Saturday, 3rd August 2013 at 11.30 am in the conference room of Circuit House, Surat. Due to unavoidable circumstances he could not remain present. The workshop was held under the Chairmanship of Shri M. K. Das, IAS, Chairman SUDA and Municipal Commissioner SMC.

The workshop was attended by Office bearers of various associations or their representatives and by the officers of SUDA and SMC. Deputy Municipal Commissioner Shri R. J Patel, IAS also remained present.

The workshop was set into motion by the welcome address by CEA of SUDA Smt. P. Bharthi, IAS. The requirement and need of the workshop was shared with the participants. Legal provision related to preparation of revised development plan was informed to the august gathering.

Senior Town Planner of SUDA Shri Prakash Dutta made an elaborate presentation on the model of urban development in the state of Gujarat, provisions of preparation of revised development plan under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban development Act, 1976, salient features of development plan which is in force, vision and aim for the revised development plan, issues which has to be addressed at the time of formulation of proposals, formation of expert committees, need for use of geo-spatial data in preparation of base map and existing landuse and for framing the proposals and related legal and technical issues were discussed.

After that forum was opened for discussion. Following suggestions were received.

Shri J. M Patel
Deputy Commissioner (P & D)
SMC Extensive study and survey is to be undertaken. Integrated mobility plan need to be prepared. Chamber of commerce should guide us for industry related proposals.
For achieving the Global standards quality institution shall be established in SURAT who can guide the planning authorities in implementing the global standards like Burla –Kurla Complex.
Area around railway station shall be improved.
Shri Basak SMC Socio-economic studies to be done and data to be analyzed by the experts. Improvement in HDI should be focused Growth in GDP should be thought
Shri Veljibhai Sheta President
Builder Association
Canal road should be widened to 60m FSI of 1.8 shall be allowed adjoining Outer ring road. Anything more that that shall be chargeable. 90m wide Dumas Magdalla road shall be proposed Road of appropriate width shall be proposed along Tapi river Vertical development to be encouraged Higher FSI and 70m height shall be proposed on 24m wide road Number of flyovers to be restricted
Mass transit facility to be encouraged River front should be developed Contour map of SUDA area shall also be prepared Bridge linking SUDA with Ubhrat shall be proposed GDCR should be simplified
Shri Suken Shah Vice President
Builder Association
Land shall be designated for Diamond bourses, Textile markets, textiles processing units Public transportation facilities shall be improved Bus facility shall be strengthened
Shri B. K. Patel Consultant Town Planner Separate zone for Small scale industries Parking as per GDCR to be ensured Multi-nuclei concept SVNIT and other planning institution to be involved Comprehensive traffic And transportation studies should be done Textile markets shall have separate parking regulations Relocation / redevelopment of Textile markets Noise map to be prepared and noise barriers may be proposed
No reservations If reservations are proposed than it shall be developed by means of TDR Ground truth must be ensured in the base map Civil aviation NOC requirement shall be waived if height as suggested by Aviation dept in the RDP is adhered by the builder People participation in preparation of RDP shall be ensured
Shri Kamlesh Yagnik President
SGCCI
Review of 2004 DP shall be done in terms of implementation, lacunae, achievements, etc.
RDP should ensure inclusive growth with human development factor Social indicators shall improve Various options for projected Growth scenarios shall be studied and than to be decided Impact of exiting infrastructure on the city shall be studied before framing proposal of next DP Impact of Adani port / Hajira industrial area shall mot be ignored Water front shall be developed
Land shall be designated for IT /ITES parks Drainage system in the textile / diamond industrial area shall be looked into properly Impact Fee shall not be introduced again.
Impact of SIR / Climate change shall also be studied and shall be taken care in then DP All stakeholders shall work collectively to have well planned RDP of SUDA for the next 10 years
Principal
SCET
Impact of development in the peri-urban area and urban agglomeration shall be studied and properly taken care in the DP
Shri Sanjay Vadia IIA Instead of conventional zoning in the DP, the concept of self sufficient zones shall be introduced.
Shri K. B. Vaghani Ex president Agriculture zone between Outer ring road and residential areas on the city side shall be properly planned. Proper connectivity linking the outer ring road and roads of SMC area shall be proposed in the RDP.
Shri Shyanil Patel Secretary ITPI Surat sub Center Incentives for redevelopment shall be proposed in the GDCR Public transport shall be improved BRTS to be encouraged
Shri R. D. Desai Retd DOP & President of ITPI Surat sub Center Reasons for not implementing the present DP shall be find out and analyzed. South Gujarat regional plan shall be made. Proper infrastructure planning and design shall be proposed in the RDP after taking the advice of the experts in this field Efficient mass transportation system shall be proposed. No impact fee in future Proposals should be such as to improve the quality of life.
Shri B. K. Patel Architect Capacity building of SUDA Infrastructure shall be improved in the SUDA office. RDP must address the issue of fund generation for the development projects Development in the peri-urban areas to be controlled. Impact of Hazira must also be captured in the RDP Mechanism for stopping the unauthorized development shall be proposed. River bank development with experts Island development / under water development shall also be thought of. Regulations proposed for Outer ring road development shall be made applicable throughout the 66 km of ORR to give equal opportunity. Affordable housing may be encouraged. Industries may be asked to compulsory provide for the housing for their employees. Public conveniences shall be strictly enforced. People friendly administrative reforms can also be part of the RDP
Shri R. J. Patel IAS Dy. M.C.
SMC
Panchayats must be educated as they are the partners in development of SUDA Urban /social forestry should be encouraged Climate change / environment aspect must be properly taken care in the RDP proposals. Urban health management may also be part of the RDP
Final observation
Sh M. K Das IAS
Chairman SUDA Regional plan shall have to be prepared under 74th CAA by MPC which will include SUDA and adjoining area also. In DP we have to propose land use which is not the solutions to all the problems of the city. SMC is serious about the traffic planning and Metro is also taken care of. Development of Port in Surat shall bring new business and development plan proposal shall be so as to take care of these developments. DFCC and express way shall have the impact on the economy of the city and surrounding areas. Affordable housing shall play the important role in framing the proposals for zoning. IT /ITES shall be encouraged in this region. SUDA can play important role. Health tourism may be encouraged through planning proposals. Zones for Quality higher education shall be proposed. Heritage conservation / environment shall be properly taken care of. River and sea front development may be considered. GDCR should be simple, comprehensive, least parameter and encouraging ease of approval. High degree of transparency in the preparation o f development plan shall be ensured Expert advice wherever required shall be taken Good working plan shall be made Dedicated website for the RDP shall be made active in the near future.

Suggestions

32 thoughts on “RDP 2035

  1. Mankesh (Subject: Other)

    AA SUGGESTION SUDA OFFICER MATE CHE ## JE LOKONA EWS LIG YOJNA NA DRAW MA NUMBER LAGELU CHE TO AEWA LOKONA GHRE JAI NE VERIFY KARO POTANU MAKAN CHEKE BHADA NU KARAN MOTA BHAGNA POTANU MAKAN WALA CHE ANE AA YOJNA GHAR VIHONA LOKO MATE CHE TO MARI VINANTI CHE KE CHAKASANI KARI LEVI AA MARI POTANI ANE LOKONI TARAFTI VYATHA CHE KRUPA KARU ACTION LEJO

  2. Mankesh (Subject: Other)

    EWS/LIG AWAS YOJNA MA JENU NAM SELECT THAYU CHE TO TEMNA GHRE JAYI NE PLEASE & AGAIN PLEASE VERIFY KARI LEVU KARAN KE JEMNA MATE A WAS BANE CHE TAONE NATHI MALYU ANE MOTA GHAR NA LOKONE MAKAN MALALU CHE TO MARI VINANTI CHE KE SARNAMU VERIFY KARJO MARU PAN NUMBER NATHI LAGYU WAITING LIST MA PAN NAM NATHI AA MARI ANE LOKONI POTANI VYATHA CHE TO AA BABAT MA KRUPA KARI ANE ASHA CHE KE DHYAN AAPSO #JAI HIND JAI BHARAT!!!

  3. KAUSHAL PATEL (Subject: Reservation)

    Keeping in mind The milestone achieved like “SAFE CITY ” and “CLEANEST CITY” There must be one more objective of D.P. to make Surat Most “Pedestrian Friendly city”. Keeping reservation in Road section will not satisfy the need but the dedicated Boulivered Pedestrian friendly walkways along with cycle ways Which may be hugged by commercial zone like shopping street …will greatly help to generate high amount of revenue and high foot fall and will also solve the purpose of pedestrian friendly walkway for citizen. which ultimately will lead to reduced vehicular traffic ,noise and air pollution. Consultation with citizen using Joggerspark at ghod dod road in early morning will greatly help to solve the purpose.

    Jai HIND

  4. KAUSHAL PATEL (Subject: Reservation)

    I request to keep and count the most mandatory preservation for “flea market and hawkers (Sabji Mandi) ” keeping in mind the proximity to the residential area and density proposed.Which can greatly reduced the pressure of hawkers and amount of west thrown at the end to roadside can greatly reduced.For this i wold like the planner sitting in the office to once go and experience the shopping at “Sabji Mandi” in the areas like UMABHAVAN -BHATAR, and in the area of ALTHAN Tenamet” where such neglect ion must be avoided and consider their share in allocation of public aminities whch is generated out of 40% deduction.Otherwise conventional way of Oriental planning D.P. will lead no where and D.P. will ail to achive the desired goal.

    Planners please be a citizen and experience the real situation and make it your priority or future planning.Make D.P. but make practical use of powers for future planning.

    Jai Hind.

  5. Vishwas (Subject: Outer Ring Road)

    Gaurav Rathod,

    FYI, as per my knowledge in rest of Gujarat 1.8 FSI is free, where as on ORR Outer Ring Road only 0.6 FSI is free the rest 3.4 FSI will be paid FSI.

    Please Request GUDC/GIDB-GoG, SUDA/SMC, to atleast 1.8 FSI free.

  6. Vishwas Sawant (Subject: Reservation)

    Gujarat IT Policy 2006-09 section 6, it’s mentioned that SMC/SUDA should reserve land for IT Sector in TP Scheme. And also in IndExtB, DMIC, DST-ICT, Vibrant Gujarat Documents.

  7. Vishwas Sawant (Subject: Outer Ring Road)

    SUDA SMC should plan dedicated IT Park/ IT SEZ on ORR. Only 4-10 Hector of land required for IT SEZ where as IT Park can be of any size small to big. Its also in Gujarat IT Policy to reserve land for IT Sector in TP Scheme. And also in IndExtB, DMIC, DST-ICT, Vibrant Gujarat Documents.

  8. lagerahonatubhai (Subject: GDCR)

    ગેરકાયદે બાંધકામ પાસ કરવા ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી અરજી નામંજૂર અસ્વીકાર થઇ હોય
    તેઓને ગાંધીનગર જીયુડીસી ખાતે અપીલ કરવા મદદ

    ગુડા,ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી કાયદો ગેરકાયદેસર બાંધકામો પાસ કરવા માટે છે. તમારી ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી ફાઈલ,નકારવામાં આવે તો 60 દિવસની અંદર,નીચે ના જેવા કારણે ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી અરજી નામંજૂર અસ્વીકાર થઇ હોય તો ગેરકાયદે બાંધકામ પાસ કરવા માટે ગાંધીનગર ખાતે અપીલ કરવા માટે રાહત દરે અમે મદદ કરીશું.
    1. 28/03/2011 પહેલાં ના મ્યુનિસિપલ ટેક્સ બિલ સિવાય ના બાંધકામ અન્ય સાબિતી અભાવે નકારી,
    2. એચટી વીજળી લાઇન પસાર,
    3. 7/12 માં સરકાર નામ પ્રવેશ નોંધ,
    4. યુ.એલ.સી ULC ફાજલ,
    5. ટેનન્સી શરત ભંગ,
    6. હેઝાર્ડસ ઝોન
    7. COP બાંધકામ અંગેસોસાયટી સંમતિ (વાંધો નથી પ્રમાણપત્ર ),
    8. વ્યક્તિગત વાંધો અરજી,ફરિયાદ,કોર્ટ કેસ,માલિકી અથવા અન્ય ઝઘડાની બાબત,
    9. TP યોજના અનામત,
    10. જમીન સંપાદન,
    11. પ્રમાણિત નકલો,
    12. ખાડી,નહેર,નદિ,સમુદ્ર અંતર પાલન,
    13. ઉપયોગ ફેરફાર,
    14. ગુ.હા.બોર્ડ સંમતિ અભાવે
    15. મુદત મર્યાદા માં વાંધા પૂર્તતા અભાવે નકારી
    16. ફાયનલ પ્લોટ અન્યને ફાળવેલ હોય તો

    નામંજૂરી ના 60 દિવસ મુદત મર્યાદા માં ગાંધીનગર ખાતે અપીલ કરી નથી તો પણ બાંધકામ પાસ કરવા માટે ગાંધીનગર ખાતે અપીલ કરવા માટે મદદ કરવામાં આવે છે,
    અમે SMC માં આરટીઆઈ અરજી દ્વારા ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી અરજી નામંજૂર નકલો મેળવી છે તેથી જેને અમે પત્ર મોકલેલ છે તેઓ એ એસએમસી ઝોન માં તપાસ કરવી અને ઇમ્પેક્ટ ફી અરજી નામંજૂર નકલ મેળવવી.
    નટુભાઇ લગે રહો ની ફોન કરી મુલાકાત માટે સોમવાર, ગુરુવાર અને રજા સિવાય -સમય 6 થી 8 વચ્ચે 310, રોમન પોઇન્ટ, હિરા બાગ, વરાછા રોડ, સુરત, અથવા 11 બપોરે 1 થી વચ્ચે,પ્રાર્થનાસંઘ, અઠવા લાઇન્સ સુરત. ફોન- 7802050596,9408104759,9879290601.

  9. Gaurav Rathod (Subject: Infrastructure)

    First of all, Hats off to SUDA & SMC…!!! Just because of your efforts we citizens of Surat witnessed such an tremendous growth. I just want to suggest that why SMC or SUDA is not focusing on 4.0 FSI in other areas of the city as well. Not just ORR but whole city needs 4.0 FSI. Please focus on it too. Thank You. 🙂

  10. Bhaskar (Subject: Roads)

    Dear Sirs,
    Many times it was found that Govt. put more focus on the areas which has already developed (i.e. Adajan, Pal, Vesu, Athwalines, Nanpura, Station Road, etc.) providing more aminities like Swmiing Pools, Library, Play Grounds, City Civic Centres, Govt. Offices, etc. But the areas belongings to the lower class peoples, labour class peoples or lower middle class peoples (i.e. Limbayat, Udhna, Dindoli, Ghodadara) have not been given even priority for providing proper road facilities, BRTS facilities, City Bus facilities, which I believe it as the injustice to them. I request the authority, kindly consider these points while desigining RDP-2035. All the Best.

  11. DIPAK J DESAI (Subject: Infrastructure)

    RESPECTED SIR

    AS WE ARE PLANING RESI. T.P WE MUST PLANING INDUSTRIA T. P IN PALSANA BAGUMRA JOLWA TATITHAIA,LAJPOR POPDA ETC. SO SUCH AREA DEVLOP PROPERLY.

    DIPAK DESAI

  12. Suresh Malik (Subject: Other)

    Railway Station:

    1) Can we not think of developing both Udhna and Utran as satellite railway stations of Surat?

    2) Sky walks at Surat Railway Station.

  13. jagdish jajadiya (Subject: GDCR)

    pls. attach with g.d.c.r.-map that clear line for gam tal and otherthan gamtal as s.m.c. area and suda area.

  14. dhiren p mendpara (Subject: Other)

    Surat city and suda road work is very fast I am very happy with work

  15. Jaimeen Trivedi (Subject: Other)

    Proper roadmap to tackle travel demand must be done. Also there should be focus on demand side along with supply side (with more emphasis on sustainable transportation in city).

  16. Jaimeen Trivedi (Subject: Zoning)

    If i am not very late here, first foremost is that there should be one chapter focussing on how land use and transportation can be integrated.

    Also, there should be more emphasis on mixed land use and higher FSI , still this depends on approach of committee, whether it is going for sprawl or compact city/smart city

    thanks

  17. KAushalPatel (Subject: Other)

    I Totally agree with MSH SHEIKH.I think we must findout some leagal way to rectify this nuisance.

  18. KAUSHAL PATEL (Subject: Roads)

    Please analyse the road junction incorporating the trafficflow so that the factor of safety will increase .Please carefully design the and analyse the junction.
    For example.
    The intersection junction of Udhana-Magadalla Road along with joggers park road has became danger as
    1>Vehicle coming from flyover and ending at junction
    2>Vehicle coming from Breadline circle and ending at junction
    Are at much higher speed which is dangerous for
    1>Vehicle merging with Udhana Magadalla road towards Bhatar char rasta from Joggars park road
    2>Vehicle merging with Udhana Magadalla road towards Breadline circle from Joggars park road
    3>Vehicle merging with Udhana Magadalla road from service road coming from Bhatar char rasta
    4>Vehicle merging with Udhana Magadalla road from 2 service roads coming from breadliner circle
    5>Vehicle Coming from joggars park road going towards service roads of Bhatar char rasta
    6>Vehicle Coming from joggars park road going towards service road of bradliner circle

    This entire caose get created and sometime also creats dangerous situations for the pedestrian crossing the road junction.I have seen very dangerous accidents on the junction and even my father had been a victim of this bad design of the junction.

    Solution can be some small speed breakers on Udhana magadalla raod so the trafic on that junction can be derived at controlled design speed suitable for the above mention junction.

    I request SUDA,SMC,Traffic police and Bridge Cell to co-ordinate and workout design of such bad design junction seriously to take care of citizen on the earliest base.

    Jai Hind

  19. Dr G J Joshi (Subject: Roads)

    Subject list should contain TRANSPORT and not mere ROAD…

    RDP 2035 MUST BE EVOLVED WITH EMPHASIS ON PUBLIC TRANSPORT.
    Population of the region is expected to cross 10 million by 2035, which will generate same number of motorised trips per day! We should have target to carry atleast 60% of these trips by public transport….
    Outer Ring Road should have rail based mass transit system connected with the radials with BRTS / LRTS…..

  20. SHAILESH (Subject: Other)

    NOW SURATI MUST ACTIVATE THEMSELVES TO PROTECT SURAT..DUE TO HIGH RATE OF DEVELOPMENT CITY HAS LOST HIS NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND PEACE…SURAT IS GOING TO BE A HUB FOR BUSINESS BUT IN BETWEEN SURATIS ARE GOING IN DEEP. SO LOCAL IDENTITY MUST BE KEPT..

  21. malay naik (Subject: GDCR)

    As we all know that surat is flood prone city. Than why it is compulsory to provide basement parking? Better increase permissible height so the parking can be given on plinth level.

    Also keep balconies free from FSI if the clear height provided between two balconies are 5.5mtr or 6 mtr. It will be beneficial for the tenant and builders both.

  22. hiten (Subject: GDCR)

    i want to know the new construction margin have to keep for passing the building from proposed DFCCI

  23. Nainesh S Barad (Subject: Roads)

    Geographical guidelines should be considered for minimum turning radious.in some cases some roads are shown meaning less ; to straighten turning curve.following are the guidelines:
    Minimum Radius (m) Minimum curve length should be 150 meters for 5 deg deflection angle and increase or decrease at the rate of 30 m for 1 degree
    Speed
    Km/ hr Plain & RollingTerrain for NH for SH & city road
    mtr mtr

    35 45 45
    40 60 60
    50 90 90
    65 155 –
    80 230 –
    100 360 –

  24. shashank bharat sheth (Subject: Other)

    sir i want to know whether high rise building vaishnodevi skyconstuction is legal or not on block 100

  25. MSH SHEIKH

    please raise your voice with all doctors as the air pollution and RTI diseases are very high in number in Pandesara and Sachin area.

  26. MSH SHEIKH (Subject: Other)

    The city plan must put buffer around the industrial cluster other wise obnoxious industry [Sachin -Pandesara ] and habitation is just side by side going presently which is unacceptable.

    There must be at least 100 hector plantation patches needed in the coastal belt of Mindhola river where maximum Governmental waste land is available like 3000 hactor in coastal belt. The plantation is very less in compare of other developing cities of india.

    Surat city has tree density of only 8.4 trees/hector and 3% of geographical area though we are getting highest rainfall …… [Ahmedabad 13.1 trees/ha & 6.66% green cover, Vadodara 45.9 trees/ha &16.3% green cover Data Source: Status of Tree Cover in Urban Areas ::by Gujarat Forest Dept 2011 report] So green cover is highly in adequate.
    there is need to increase the forest cover people must raise voice on the natural lungs for their upcoming generation otherwise present poor planning will create only concrete jungle.

    MSH Sheikh { Environmental activist 0-9825546017}

  27. Hitesh Shrishimal (Subject: Zoning)

    Concept of Local Area Planning must be brought and proper guidelines must be prepared for the same.

    The plan must consist of a written statement and map or maps, which set out the local authorities’ objectives for the plan area. These objectives may relate to any or all of the following:

    Land Use Zoning & Density
    Public Open Space
    Private Open Space
    Car Parking
    Provision of Infrastructure
    Conservation of Built Heritage
    Conservation of Natural Environment
    Provision of Traveller Accommodation
    Community Facilities
    Design & Development Standards.

    The policies or objectives contained in a Local Area Plan must be consistent with the objectives of the Development Plan and must include information on the likely significant effects on the environment of implementing the Plan.

  28. sunil dangi (Subject: Roads)

    Bridge connecting from surat to ubharat is must. The same will divert the traffic & as ubharat is free zone and not having any pollution so the residential proposal may be considered. Every one can afford to buy and own house over their. As the proposal is pending since long and I hope to click this project with immediate effect

  29. Dr Ashok B H (Subject: Other)

    Subject: pollution

    in overall development we shoud plan
    to reduce pollution & to form such a plan will help in pollution free environment help in Healthier lifestyle

Comments are closed.